The biggest difference between Klaviyo and Omnisend is what they treat as the “center” of marketing: Klaviyo is built around a unified customer data foundation that fuels deeper segmentation and personalization across channels, while Omnisend prioritizes an ecommerce-first marketing workflow that bundles core omnichannel execution into a more guided toolkit. If your strategy depends on maximizing what you can do with behavioral and transactional signals, the split shows up quickly.
That tradeoff exists because Klaviyo’s product bet is on owning and continuously updating rich customer profiles in real time, positioning the platform as a combined data + marketing system, whereas Omnisend’s product bet is on packaging the most common ecommerce campaign and automation motions into a single, streamlined environment. In practice, Klaviyo’s emphasis on data depth pushes toward more granular targeting and orchestration, while Omnisend’s emphasis on packaged workflows pushes toward faster setup and simpler day-to-day execution.
For buyers, the stakes are less about “email vs SMS” and more about how you want your lifecycle engine to run: how much segmentation complexity you’ll maintain, how connected your channels feel, and how much effort you’ll invest to keep data, audiences, and reporting aligned. The rest of this comparison unpacks what changes as you scale automation depth, expand channel reach, and balance operational overhead against personalization ambition.