All Features on Every Plan. No Lock-In.

Campaign Monitor Alternatives

Explore alternatives to Campaign Monitor based on how teams actually work.

Last updated: December 28, 2025

How to Read This List

Teams exploring options beyond Campaign Monitor typically face decisions around pricing structure, automation depth, or how the tool fits their specific workflow (creator-focused vs ecommerce vs general email).

The platforms below are ordered by use case similarity. Each section describes how teams actually work with the tool day to day — not just feature lists.

#1 Mailchimp

Mailchimp screenshot

Mailchimp is typically used by marketing teams and owner-operators who need a central place to manage audiences and run recurring outreach like newsletters, promotions, and lifecycle messaging.

Teams import or sync contacts, organize them with tags and segments, then build and schedule campaigns tied to a calendar. Ongoing work often mixes one-off sends with automated journeys triggered by signup, purchase, or engagement, followed by performance review and iteration.

Good Fit For

  • Teams sending weekly or monthly newsletters and occasional announcements, with a repeatable build-review-schedule cadence
  • Ecommerce or subscription brands running welcome, abandoned cart, and post-purchase messaging based on site or store activity
  • Small marketing teams that want audience organization, basic campaign planning, and reporting in one workflow rather than separate tools

Considerations

  • As automations and segmentation rules grow, governance can become harder, especially if multiple people build journeys without shared naming and documentation
  • Teams with strict internal approval, brand control, or complex cross-channel coordination may still need external project management to manage reviews and handoffs

#2 MailerLite

MailerLite screenshot

MailerLite is typically used by small marketing teams, creators, and agencies that need to run email newsletters, basic lifecycle automation, and lead capture from one workspace. It often supports lightweight campaign operations with a single owner or a few collaborators.

Teams usually organize subscribers into groups and segments, then alternate between scheduled newsletter sends and always-on automations. Day to day work involves drafting emails, connecting signup forms or landing pages to lists, setting triggers (joins a group, form submitted, link clicked, purchase events), and reviewing performance to adjust targeting and content.

Good Fit For

  • Teams sending weekly or monthly newsletters and want a repeatable workflow for drafting, approvals, and scheduled delivery
  • Businesses using forms or landing pages to collect leads and automatically deliver welcome sequences, lead magnets, or onboarding emails
  • Ecommerce or paid content teams running triggered flows like abandoned cart reminders, post-purchase follow-ups, and interest-based nurturing

Considerations

  • As programs grow into many audiences and overlapping automations, governance can require extra process outside the tool to avoid duplicated logic and inconsistent segmentation
  • Teams with strict brand, legal, or multi-step review requirements may need additional coordination to manage approvals and publishing cadence across multiple stakeholders

#3 Constant Contact

Constant Contact screenshot

Constant Contact is commonly used by small businesses and nonprofits that run recurring email outreach and need a straightforward way to manage contacts, sign-ups, and campaign sends. It is often owned by a marketing generalist or office manager rather than a dedicated ops team.

Teams typically import or collect contacts through forms and landing pages, then organize them into lists and segments for regular newsletters and announcements. Day to day, they draft emails from templates, schedule sends around weekly or monthly cadence, and review engagement reports to adjust future messages or resend to non-openers. Automation is often set up for simple triggers like welcome messages, birthdays, or follow-ups after sign-up.

Good Fit For

  • Teams sending a weekly or monthly newsletter and occasional announcements, with basic segmentation based on engagement or contact fields
  • Organizations that need to grow a list through sign-up forms or landing pages and then run scheduled campaigns from a shared calendar
  • Groups running event-driven outreach where messages are tied to milestones like joining, registering, or post-event follow-up

Considerations

  • Campaign workflows tend to center on list-and-send operations, which can feel limiting for teams that want deeply branching lifecycle programs tied to many real-time behaviors
  • Building and rearranging email layouts can require hands-on editor work, which may slow iteration when multiple stakeholders need frequent content changes

#4 Brevo

Brevo screenshot

Brevo is used by teams that need to manage customer communications across email and SMS while keeping contact data and basic relationship tracking in one place. It often shows up in small-to-mid sized marketing and operations setups that run both recurring sends and triggered messages.

Teams typically import and organize contacts, build segments from attributes and engagement, then run a mix of scheduled campaigns and automated flows like welcome, cart recovery, and post-purchase follow-ups. Day to day work centers on drafting messages, scheduling sends, monitoring deliverability and performance metrics, and iterating based on results.

Good Fit For

  • Teams running weekly newsletters plus lifecycle automations that react to signups, purchases, or inactivity
  • Organizations that need transactional notifications and marketing messages coordinated from the same contact database
  • Teams that want lightweight CRM-style tracking alongside campaign execution and list management

Considerations

  • Some teams report occasional deliverability or account review interruptions that can slow time-sensitive sends
  • The platform spans multiple communication use cases, which can add setup work to keep segmentation, automations, and data hygiene consistent

#5 GetResponse

GetResponse screenshot

GetResponse is typically used by marketing teams and small-to-midsize organizations that run recurring email campaigns and automated customer journeys. It is also used by agencies coordinating campaigns and reporting across multiple client accounts.

Teams build contact lists from forms and landing pages, then segment audiences using behavior and profile data. Day to day, they draft emails, route them for internal approval, and run scheduled sends alongside always-on automations triggered by actions like signups, clicks, or purchases.

Good Fit For

  • Teams running weekly newsletters plus automated nurture sequences that change based on engagement signals
  • Organizations capturing leads through landing pages and webinars, then following up with time-based and behavior-based messaging
  • Agencies managing multiple brands where collaborators need controlled access, approvals, and shareable performance reporting

Considerations

  • Using one workspace for email, landing pages, webinars, and automations can increase setup time and process coordination compared to keeping each workflow separate
  • Automation programs that rely on tagging, scoring, and event tracking require ongoing list hygiene and governance to prevent segments and journeys from drifting over time

#6 ActiveCampaign

ActiveCampaign screenshot

ActiveCampaign is typically used by marketing and revenue teams that run ongoing lifecycle messaging and want sales follow-up to stay connected to engagement data. It is often adopted where email programs and lead management are managed together.

Teams centralize contacts, apply tags and segments, and run automations triggered by behaviors like form fills, email clicks, purchases, or site activity. Work tends to be continuous: maintaining evergreen nurture flows, adjusting branching logic, and coordinating handoffs by creating deals, tasks, and notifications for sales.

Good Fit For

  • Teams running always-on nurture sequences that change based on contact behavior and engagement over time
  • Organizations that need marketing-triggered handoffs to a pipeline, with tasks and reminders for follow-up
  • Operators managing multiple intake sources (forms, integrations, site tracking) and standardizing tagging and segmentation rules

Considerations

  • Automation-heavy setups require ongoing governance to keep tags, segments, and workflows understandable as they expand
  • Teams focused mainly on one-off newsletters may find day-to-day work shifts toward maintaining journeys and data rules instead of campaign-only execution

#7 Benchmark Email

Benchmark Email screenshot

Benchmark Email is typically used by small marketing teams and generalist marketers who need a straightforward way to produce and send recurring promotional emails and newsletters. It tends to fit teams that prioritize speed of execution and simple coordination over highly complex lifecycle orchestration.

Teams usually start by organizing contacts with lists, tags, and custom fields, then build campaigns in a drag-and-drop editor using reusable layouts. Work runs in a weekly or campaign cadence: draft, segment, schedule, send, then review engagement reports to decide follow-ups and adjust targeting.

Good Fit For

  • Teams sending weekly newsletters and one-off promotions with light segmentation based on tags or basic subscriber attributes
  • Marketers who need to build and launch a campaign quickly, with a repeatable draft-to-send workflow and simple approval coordination
  • Organizations that manage contacts in one place and rely on post-send engagement reporting to plan the next campaign’s content and audience

Considerations

  • If your workflow depends on deeply branched, behavior-driven journeys across many touchpoints, the operating model may feel more campaign-centric than journey-centric
  • Teams with heavy governance needs may find that keeping consistency across many variants and segments requires extra process outside the tool